Some people feel that $CME is slow with audits and the integration of third-party wallets. But that is precisely what makes it novel; if it were just reinventing the wheel—using standard ETH trading pairs—would it even need audits or third-party integrations? Those things happen automatically. New innovations require new integrations, which is exactly where the opportunity lies. Back when BRC-20 inscriptions first launched, only OKX supported them; other major wallets followed later, and the early adopters made hundreds of times their initial investment. You have to be open to new things to make big money. You can't demand a low price *and* have everything fully integrated right from the start. It’s sitting at a $4 million valuation precisely because full integration hasn't happened yet; if it were already fully integrated, the entry price would be over $20 million. You have to accept the gradual process of integration—that’s where the opportunity gap exists. It is the first project to use the "meme" concept to solve on-chain liquidity for commodities. The fundamental logic—that the liquidity pool will continue to grow—remains sound, so it is bound to succeed in the future; the rest is just a matter of time.
Theses & replies
MetaMask has just removed the risk warning regarding CME.
I just verified the code for the CME liquidity pool; the CME developer does not have the authority to withdraw USDG—only the authority to adjust the pegged price. He is an excellent developer.
The developer has launched a staking system. I conducted a code audit and found it to be secure; it appears he is serious about the project, as he does not have the authority to transfer the staked tokens.
CME has just passed a third-party security audit by SerializedAudit and has been designated as a launch platform.
I am bullish on this project; the development team has been consistently adding new features from the start and launched the first commodity-style meme token with a dividend mechanism. Crucially, this model ensures the continuous growth of the commodity liquidity pool and drives higher burn rates, giving it greater potential than $pons.
CME has just minted a coin, and users have received their gold allocation; it is tradable on GMGN, and other wallets are currently integrating it. This proves his logic is correct; the developers have been working on it.
Goodk
@Goodk
- Trades
- 19
- Swaps
- 32
- Volume
- $60.7K
- Avg hold
- 1.4d
- Total PnL
- +$37K
Top closed
Updated 12h ago9 closed · top 5 by realized PnL
- Commodity Market Exchange closed Sep 9 · in $14.9K +$2.1K+14%
- Ethereum closed Sep 10 · in $4 $0-0.7%
- $PHAT closed Sep 10 · in $10 -$1-5.5%
- Commodity Market Exchange closed Sep 9 · in $10 -$1-5.8%
- Ethereum closed Sep 4 · in $940 -$2-0.2%
Active holdings
Updated 1d ago$55.7K total · 4 tokens
-
Value $55.5K 15.1M CMEProfit +$38.7K+230%
-
Errol Coin #2Value $130 2.4M ERROLProfit -$259-67%
-
Crapcoin #3Value $25 3.6M CrapcoinProfit -$447-95%
-
Ethereum #4Value $2 0 WETHProfit —
Value at the latest price. PnL is realized + unrealized on the current position, and % is of the amount invested in it. "—" means fomo has no entry price, so PnL can't be worked out.
On fomofeed
- Theses
- 7
- Replies
- 0
- Tokens
- 1
- Avg position
- $69.9K
- Median PnL at post
- +315%
- Last thesis
- 2h ago
Chains
- 7
Fades on their calls
all →No fades on their calls yet.
